Files
cariflex/tools/EVerest-main/docs/source/explanation/tier-module-mappings.rst
Eric F d398a6ced2 Add extracted tools: CitrineOS, OpenOCPP, ShapeShifter
- CitrineOS core extracted (CSMS OCPP 2.0.1)
- OpenOCPP extracted (firmware OCPP 1.6J/2.0.1)
- ShapeShifter library installed (pip install -e)
- ShapeShifter specification extracted
- EVerest extracted

TODO updated with progress
2026-06-08 00:38:27 -04:00

96 lines
3.1 KiB
ReStructuredText

.. _tier_module_mapping:
**********************
3-tier Module Mappings
**********************
EVerest modules and even individual interface implementations can have mappings
assigned to them. These mappings are inspired by the OCPP 3-tier model and are
available for error handling since `everest-framework v0.16.0 <https://github.com/EVerest/everest-framework/releases/tag/v0.16.0>`_,
which is included in EVerest since `release 2024.7.0. <https://github.com/EVerest/EVerest/releases/tag/2024.7.0>`_.
These mappings are exposed for usage in module code since `everest-framework v0.18.0 <https://github.com/EVerest/everest-framework/releases/tag/v0.18.0>`_,
which is included in EVerest since `release 2024.10.0. <https://github.com/EVerest/EVerest/releases/tag/2024.10.0>`_.
Following an example how a mappping for the EvseManager could look like:
.. code-block:: yaml
connector_1:
module: EvseManager
mapping:
module:
evse: 1
connector: 1
This would result in a mapping of the whole module,
including its implementations for e.g. evse and token_provider to "evse = 1"
and "connector = 1".
By default, a module is mapped to the whole charging station.
So to ensure that only the parts of the module that should belong
to a specific evse/connector are actually mapped to it,
you could replace this simple mapping with a more detailed one
as shown in the following example:
.. code-block:: yaml
connector_1:
module: EvseManager
mapping:
implementations:
evse:
evse: 1
connector: 1
Here, the module stays mapped to the whole charging station
and therefore an implementation as well. For the "evse" implementation,
this mapping is now overwritten to indicate that it belongs to
a specific "evse = 1" and "connector = 1".
Modules can access the mapping information in the following ways depending
on which specific information is required.
If the mapping of a requirement is of interest it can be accessed via a
get_mapping() function:
.. code-block:: cpp
r_name_of_the_requirement->get_mapping()
This returns an optional Mapping struct.
If the mapping of an interface implementation is of interest it can
also be accessed via a get_mapping() function:
.. code-block:: cpp
p_name_of_an_implementation->get_mapping()
This returns an optional Mapping struct.
If the mapping of the current module is of interest it can be accessed via the
module info:
.. code-block:: cpp
this->info.mapping
This returns an optional Mapping struct.
Mapping information is also available in error reporting via
"error.origin.mapping":
.. code-block:: cpp
const auto error_handler = [this](const Everest::error::Error& error) {
const auto evse_id = error.origin.mapping.has_value() ? error.origin.mapping.value().evse : 0;
};
const auto error_cleared_handler = [this](const Everest::error::Error& error) {
const auto evse_id = error.origin.mapping.has_value() ? error.origin.mapping.value().evse : 0;
};
subscribe_global_all_errors(error_handler, error_cleared_handler);